Transforming Reimbursement Policies for Authorised Push Payment Scams: Current Landscape and Future Strategies

The landscape of reimbursement policies for authorised push payment (APP) scams is undergoing a significant transformation, spurred by recent legislative changes in the UK. With the Royal Assent granted to the Financial Services and Markets Bill in June 2023, the Payment Systems Regulator (PSR) now has the authority to implement an innovative method, evenly dividing the reimbursement costs for APP scams between the banks responsible for sending and receiving funds. This article provides a comprehensive review of the existing reimbursement procedures, outlines upcoming changes, and offers strategic guidance to assist banks in preparing for this transformative shift. 

 Current Reimbursement Framework

Initiated in 2019, the Contingent Reimbursement Model (CRM) Code is a voluntary initiative aimed at mitigating the impact of APP scams. Under this code, Payment Service Providers (PSPs) commit to reimbursing victims who have followed prescribed guidelines. The code, overseen by the Lending Standards Board (LSB), establishes unwavering standards for signatory PSPs and provides a robust dispute resolution mechanism through the Financial Ombudsman Service. 

 Upcoming Changes in the UK

Recent legislative amendments empower the PSR to enforce mandatory reimbursement for APP scams, ushering in a 50:50 cost-sharing model between sending and receiving banks. This shift advocates for a holistic fraud prevention approach, requiring banks to recalibrate their focus on both outgoing and incoming transactions. Pivotal features include reinforced rules within Faster Payments, consistent minimum standards for customer protection, and transparent industry guidance. 

Global Implications and Considerations

While the UK leads in innovative reimbursement models, global markets closely observe these changes. Australia and Singapore are contemplating similar approaches, prompting discussions on unintended consequences such as heightened risk and potential financial exclusion. Banks globally are urged to prioritise robust fraud prevention measures, leveraging advanced data analytics, instituting comprehensive customer education, and establishing an adaptive feedback loop to navigate evolving reimbursement policies effectively. 

Last Updated: March 16, 2026

About Author:

Sonal Bomb, CEO of TechnoXander, professional portrait highlighting leadership, innovation, and company vision.

Sonal Bomb

Sonal Bomb specialises in payments regulation, fraud prevention, and compliance frameworks across the UK and EU. She works closely with banks and PSPs on implementing Verification of Payee (VoP), Confirmation of Payee (CoP), and Open Banking requirements, translating evolving regulatory mandates into practical payment infrastructure.

VoP • CoP • Open Banking • PSD2/PSD3 • Payment Fraud Prevention • FiDA

LinkedIn Profile
Tags :
Social Share with Tooltip

Related Post

The Next Phase of AML Is Not Better Detection. It Is Better Decisions.

The Next Phase of AML Is Not Better Detection. It Is Better Decisions.

What is the next phase of AML maturity? It is the…

The AML Vendor Landscape Is Crowded. The Investigation Quality Gap Is Not Being Filled.

The AML Vendor Landscape Is Crowded. The Investigation Quality Gap Is Not Being Filled.

What is the investigation quality gap in the AML vendor market?…

Crypto, Digital Assets, and AML: The Investigation Gap That Keeps Getting Wider

Crypto, Digital Assets, and AML: The Investigation Gap That Keeps Getting Wider

What is the investigation gap in crypto AML? On-chain analytics can…